tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post117082114946723836..comments2023-10-17T04:15:35.804-04:00Comments on The Ratttler: CALLING ALL ANONS TO A CHALLENGEFacetious Musehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07140409354466938422noreply@blogger.comBlogger61125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1172340356835464112007-02-24T13:05:00.000-05:002007-02-24T13:05:00.000-05:00US 'could be going bankrupt' By Edmund Conway, Eco...US 'could be going bankrupt' <BR/><BR/>By Edmund Conway, Economics Editor <BR/>(Filed: 14/07/2006) <BR/> link to www.telegraph.co.uk <BR/><BR/>The United States is heading for bankruptcy, according to an extraordinary paper published by one of the key members of the country's central bank. <BR/><BR/>A ballooning budget deficit and a pensions and welfare timebomb could send the economic superpower into insolvency, according to research by Professor Laurence Kotlikoff for the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, a leading constituent of the US Federal Reserve. <BR/><BR/>Prof Kotlikoff said that, by some measures, the US is already bankrupt. "To paraphrase the Oxford English Dictionary, is the United States at the end of its resources, exhausted, stripped bare, destitute, bereft, wanting in property, or wrecked in consequence of failure to pay its creditors," he asked. <BR/><BR/>According to his central analysis, "the US government is, indeed, bankrupt, insofar as it will be unable to pay its creditors, who, in this context, are current and future generations to whom it has explicitly or implicitly promised future net payments of various kinds''. <BR/><BR/>The budget deficit in the US is not massive. The Bush administration this week cut its forecasts for the fiscal shortfall this year by almost a third, saying it will come in at 2.3pc of gross domestic product. This is smaller than most European countries - including the UK - which have deficits north of 3pc of GDP. <BR/><BR/>Prof Kotlikoff, who teaches at Boston University, says: "The proper way to consider a country's solvency is to examine the lifetime fiscal burdens facing current and future generations. If these burdens exceed the resources of those generations, get close to doing so, or simply get so high as to preclude their full collection, the country's policy will be unsustainable and can constitute or lead to national bankruptcy. <BR/><BR/>"Does the United States fit this bill? No one knows for sure, but there are strong reasons to believe the United States may be going broke." <BR/><BR/>Experts have calculated that the country's long-term "fiscal gap" between all future government spending and all future receipts will widen immensely as the Baby Boomer generation retires, and as the amount the state will have to spend on healthcare and pensions soars. The total fiscal gap could be an almost incomprehensible $65.9 trillion, according to a study by Professors Gokhale and Smetters. <BR/><BR/>The figure is massive because President George W Bush has made major tax cuts in recent years, and because the bill for Medicare, which provides health insurance for the elderly, and Medicaid, which does likewise for the poor, will increase greatly due to demographics. <BR/><BR/>Prof Kotlikoff said: "This figure is more than five times US GDP and almost twice the size of national wealth. One way to wrap one's head around $65.9trillion is to ask what fiscal adjustments are needed to eliminate this red hole. The answers are terrifying. One solution is an immediate and permanent doubling of personal and corporate income taxes. Another is an immediate and permanent two-thirds cut in Social Security and Medicare benefits. A third alternative, were it feasible, would be to immediately and permanently cut all federal discretionary spending by 143pc." <BR/><BR/>The scenario has serious implications for the dollar. If investors lose confidence in the US's future, and suspect the country may at some point allow inflation to erode away its debts, they may reduce their holdings of US Treasury bonds. <BR/><BR/>Prof Kotlikoff said: "The United States has experienced high rates of inflation in the past and appears to be running the same type of fiscal policies that engendered hyperinflations in 20 countries over the past century." <BR/><BR/>Paul Ashworth, of Capital Economics, was more sanguine about the coming retirement of the Baby Boomer generation. "For a start, the expected deterioration in the Federal budget owes more to rising per capita spending on health care than to changing demographics," he said. <BR/><BR/>"This can be contained if the political will is there. Similarly, the expected increase in social security spending can be controlled by reducing the growth rate of benefits. Expecting a fix now is probably asking too much of short-sighted politicians who have no incentives to do so. But a fix, or at least a succession of patches, will come when the problem becomes more pressing."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171904812832452062007-02-19T12:06:00.000-05:002007-02-19T12:06:00.000-05:00Guess I typed too fast this time... should be... s...Guess I typed too fast this time... <BR/><BR/>should be... something and ignorant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171900497312167682007-02-19T10:54:00.000-05:002007-02-19T10:54:00.000-05:00Thats whats wrong with you idiots. You are always...Thats whats wrong with you idiots. You are always trying to make soemthing out of nothing. Go directly to the Federal Reserve site and find out how it works and what goes on from the source itself. For those of you too ignornat or lazy to find it......<BR/><BR/>http://federalreserve.gov/general.htm<BR/><BR/>All of you don the dunce cap and sit in the corner!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171802641681182982007-02-18T07:44:00.000-05:002007-02-18T07:44:00.000-05:00Damn it!Ok. Remove the space from the item in quot...Damn it!<BR/><BR/>Ok. Remove the space from the item in quotes and that should give the address.<BR/><BR/>"http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/<BR/><BR/>flaherty/flaherty1.html"WFGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10892786804092675170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171802489843400202007-02-18T07:41:00.000-05:002007-02-18T07:41:00.000-05:00I can't see the link in full. Just incase:http://w...I can't see the link in full. Just incase:<BR/><BR/>http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/flaherty1.htmlWFGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10892786804092675170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171802375099243262007-02-18T07:39:00.000-05:002007-02-18T07:39:00.000-05:00For balance. I don't claim to understand this stuf...For balance. I don't claim to understand this stuff, nor that the source of these challenges to Facetious Muse's post on the Federal Reserve is highly credible. I am attempting only to provide an alternative perspective, not necessarily my own.<BR/><BR/>http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/flaherty1.html<BR/><BR/>If you change the number in the url, 1-9, you should get a new page related to supposed myths about the Federal Reserve. I've not found an index of them yet.WFGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10892786804092675170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171664831448840922007-02-16T17:27:00.000-05:002007-02-16T17:27:00.000-05:00Ahh if you only wanted debate muse. If only, but ...Ahh if you only wanted debate muse. If only, but that was not your intention. Nor is it your attention to enlighten. Please, you're embarrassing yourself. <BR/><BR/>You're daddy must be a glassmaker because we can see right through you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171642280993662832007-02-16T11:11:00.000-05:002007-02-16T11:11:00.000-05:00p.s. Debate is discussing the pros and cons of an...p.s. Debate is discussing the pros and cons of an issue. Therefore any facts, ideals, suggestions, etc... can be debated<BR/><BR/>Will some people never learn? *SMH*<BR/><BR/>ROFLMAOMysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171642056035611592007-02-16T11:07:00.000-05:002007-02-16T11:07:00.000-05:00Again, AnonyMouse, you assume. *SMH*Is it so hard ...Again, AnonyMouse, you assume. *SMH*<BR/>Is it so hard for you to accept that out in the big world, perhaps we all could learn from each other?<BR/><BR/>No, that isn't something you desire, what ever would you do with all of your pent up anger then?<BR/><BR/>I'm happy to know that as you <I>try</I> to insult me, you are giving another poor soul a break.<BR/><BR/>~~~~~Forever A Facetious Pain~~~~~MysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171634032411472582007-02-16T08:53:00.000-05:002007-02-16T08:53:00.000-05:00muse, daring anyone to challenge information that ...muse, <BR/><BR/>daring anyone to challenge information that you googled isnt debate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171607018450460572007-02-16T01:23:00.000-05:002007-02-16T01:23:00.000-05:00BTW, I guess most AnonyMouses lack the bility to d...BTW, I guess most AnonyMouses lack the bility to debate, but we must not give up :o)<BR/><BR/>~~~~~Forever A Facetious Pain~~~~~~<BR/>~~~~~smile, it confuses people~~~~MysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171585020264143382007-02-15T19:17:00.000-05:002007-02-15T19:17:00.000-05:00muse just wanted to prove she knows how to google....muse just wanted to prove she knows how to google. <BR/><BR/>Very good muse.... we SEE what nice things you can do. Good job. <BR/><BR/>Ok. everyone back to their regularly scheduled activities, muse is moving on to finger paint.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171571084001263082007-02-15T15:24:00.000-05:002007-02-15T15:24:00.000-05:00BTW, in case some anonyMouses haven't figured it o...BTW, in case some anonyMouses haven't figured it out yet. <B>ALL COLLECTED INCOME TAXES GO TO PAY THE INTEREST OWED TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE</B><BR/>Not one cent of collected income taxes go to any social programs or the military. It doesn't even go to pay on the principal of the loans made to the US from the F.R.<BR/><BR/>F.R. is <B>NOT</B> a governmental office, never was, not in any shape or form (sorry anonymousposter.<BR/><BR/>There are many theories out about the F.R. and income taxes, I'm not stating my views of this matter, only sharing info, what you do with it is your choice.<BR/><BR/>Ok AnonyMouses, what more insult do you feel the need to throw? Get it out of your system, then perhaps we all can go on to debating issues that affect us all. DO I expect anonyMouses to join in with anything other than insults? No I don't, but we can always hope.<BR/><BR/>~~~~~Forever A Facetious Pain~~~~~<BR/><I>p.s.To everyone that contributed to this thread, thank you (yes even you anonymousposter). To the rest, well what can one expect from anal retentive personalities?</I><BR/><BR/>Carry onMysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171570503793401272007-02-15T15:15:00.000-05:002007-02-15T15:15:00.000-05:00How the Federal Reserve banks work (using a 10% re...How the Federal Reserve banks work (using a 10% reserve<BR/>requirement).<BR/><BR/> 1. F.R. "creates" $1,000,000 worth of "debt certificates" with no assets behind the creation, just the "OK" of Congress, and distributes it to banks.<BR/> 2. The bank "Holds" the 10% reserve as operating capital ($100,000) and loans the rest out at 10% interest.<BR/> 3. The bank pockets $90,000 in interest, and accepts the $900,000 back as a deposit.<BR/> 4. The bank retains 10% of the $900,000 deposit as a reserve, and loans out the $810,000 at 10% interest.<BR/> 5. The process is repeated over and over, with "hard" assets pledged as collateral for these "loans". Thus, it starts with "no money" and ends up with houses, cars, land, silver, gold...real assets...and all it took was some ink, some paper, and the cooperation of Congress.<BR/><BR/>The BIRTH of money #1...Congress authorizes the F.R. to purchase U.<BR/>S. Notes from the U.S. Bureau of Engraving for 2.5 cents per bill (no<BR/>difference between $1 and $1000 bills). The F.R. then issues an equal amount of "debt certificate" Federal Reserve Notes which they use to purchase U.S. Treasury Bonds. Taxpayers are, supposedly, obligated to pay off these bonds at FULL FACE VALUE, plus the debt of the original currency purchased at 2.5 cents per bill!<BR/><BR/>All credit is hypothecated upon the faith and worthiness of the "United States". Congress authorizes various<BR/>corporations to extend the credit of the United States (as a privilege, not a right) to finance mortgages and other types of credit. You and I could not set up shop to extend credit to others, except we be licensed and approved by the government. Thus, it is not the mortgage company, with whom you sign<BR/>a contract, who extends you credit...they are only an "agent"... it is the United States who is the party with standing, and the only entity which can sue or foreclose for breech of the contract. (BET YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT!) Then there is the credit contract itself...a fraud perpetrated upon the buyer every time. It is another means of "creation" of money. There is no "money" exchanged in the mortgage transaction. It is a book entry made by the "agent" which "monetizes" the value of the real thing, the property involved. No contract is valid except both parties bring something of value, called "consideration", to seal the contract. You are bringing the property, and the promise of future payments...they bring nothing but the ability to create credit...a congressional "okie-dokie"...to the contract. Thus the government fraudulently claims superior ownership rights to the property<BR/>involved, and the ability to charge the "tenant" rent (called property<BR/>taxes, bet U thought U owned that property, right?) for the privilege of using paper credit.<BR/><BR/><B>The taxes paid by Americans never provide ANY services to our country...all collected income tax money goes DIRECTLY to the F.R. Board</B>.<BR/><BR/>All U. S currency is "Federal Reserve Notes" of debt, owed to the<BR/>Federal Reserve, and is borrowed into existence. How can you pay the debt when you have to "borrow" the currency to pay the debt, FROM THE GUYS YOU ALREADY OWE? It is like paying off your VISA card using THE SAME VISA CARD...the interest just keeps growing, and no principal is ever paid! Thus, the national debt can never be repaid. It is not meant to be repaid.<BR/><BR/>More that half the shareholdings in the Federal Reserve Bank are controlled by large New York City banks, including National City Bank, National Bank of Commerce, First National Bank, Chase National Bank, and Marine National Bank. When Rockefeller's National City Bank merged with J.P. Morgan's First National Bank in 1955, the Rockefeller group owned 22 percent of the shares of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which in turn holds the majority of shares in the Federal Reserve System - 53 percent. But who really owns what? Here arc the top controllers of the Federal Reserve Bank<BR/><BR/>1. Rothchild banks of London and Berlin.<BR/><BR/>2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris.<BR/><BR/>3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy.<BR/><BR/>4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam.<BR/><BR/>5. Lehman Brothers Bank of New York.<BR/><BR/>6. Kuhn, Loeb bank of New York.<BR/><BR/>7. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York, which controls all of the other 11 Federal Rwerve Banks.<BR/><BR/>8. Goldman, Sachs Bank of New York.<BR/><BR/>This ownership combination has been challenged by the Federal Reserve Bank, but a study of Standards and Poors will verify the ownerships. This means that the controlling interest of our national monetary system is foreign. In 1797, John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson, "All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects of the Constitution or Confederation; not from any want of honor or virtue, as much as downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation." In simple terms, the United States Government borrows money from the Federal Reserve Bank with interest. <B>Here is how it works: The Government wants $1 billion. The Federal Reserve prints $1 billion - based upon no hard asset - and lends it to the Government at a high interest rate. The bank did not have the original money, it created it and made a bookkeeping entry - like you writing yourself a check without funds and cashing it. </B>The Federal Reserve controls the flow of money, making it tight and creating unemployment or printing more than actually exists and creates inflation. It is, in wessence, a paper corporation, which controls the entire economic well-being of the nation.<BR/><BR/>Yet there is a catch - one that President Kennedy recognized before he was slain - the original deal in 1913 creating the Federal Reserve Bank had a simple backout clause. The investors loaned the United States Government $1 billion. And the backout clause allows the United States to buy out the system for that $1 billion. If the Federal Reserve Bank were demolished and the Congress of the United States took control of the currency, as required in the Constitution, the National Debt would virtually end overnight, and the need for more taxes and even the income tax, itself. <BR/><BR/>Thomas Jefferson was concise in his early warning to the American nation, <B>"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."</B><BR/><BR/><I><B>"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by<BR/>partiotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar."--Julius Caesar.</I></B>MysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171565859062237682007-02-15T13:57:00.000-05:002007-02-15T13:57:00.000-05:00Satarel, I couldn't agree moreSatarel, I couldn't agree moreMysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171564431601402812007-02-15T13:33:00.000-05:002007-02-15T13:33:00.000-05:00Howard Zinn. "The Greatest Generation,"The Progres...<B>Howard Zinn. "The Greatest Generation,"<BR/>The Progressive, October 2001"<BR/>Completing The American Revolution</B><BR/><BR/>Anonymous, thank you for adding to the discussion. Also this is info I kind of knew about but not really due to not knowing where to find this type of info. I will be looking into this tyvm.MysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171564150453547882007-02-15T13:29:00.000-05:002007-02-15T13:29:00.000-05:00Anonymous said... Everybody knows what the piec...<B> Anonymous said...<BR/><BR/> Everybody knows what the piechart looks like. We've all seen that the majority of spending goes to the military. What's your point muse? </B><BR/><BR/>Although it is true US spends a great portion of money on Defense, collected income taxes do NOT go towards anoy military spending at all. Good try though, I'm impressed<BR/><BR/>~~~~~Forever A factious Pain~~~~~MysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171563977751769022007-02-15T13:26:00.000-05:002007-02-15T13:26:00.000-05:00Anonymous said... muse you moron it goes toward...<B> Anonymous said...<BR/><BR/> muse you moron it goes towards paying off the national debt. When we need more, we borrow it. Common knowledge. What's you fucking point? </B><BR/>Partially right, but not comepletely. Yet, y ou are on the right track. I do want to ask you, how do we get loans from F.R.? I mean what do you use to show we have the ability to pay back those loans, do you know?MysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171563783373069162007-02-15T13:23:00.000-05:002007-02-15T13:23:00.000-05:00Eff, I too thought that income taxes started as a ...Eff, I too thought that income taxes started as a way to fund WWI and that is was on a volunteer base and not to be perm. Who knows perhaps that the idea at first. <BR/>Eff, tyMysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171563665215529292007-02-15T13:21:00.000-05:002007-02-15T13:21:00.000-05:00jay156 said... "you can't answer my question" let ...<B>jay156 said... <BR/>"you can't answer my question" let me just say I'm not here to answer your question.</B><BR/>Why should I or anyone else expect anything more from you jay? We have all figured out that you are NOT able to debate, the intellegence needed for debates, is something you lack greatly in. But keep trying, you might get it right one day, keep aiming for the stars jay.<BR/><BR/>~~~~~Forever A Facetious Pain~~~~MysticSeaMaidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07517459119151313667noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171555456310669402007-02-15T11:04:00.000-05:002007-02-15T11:04:00.000-05:00Are you sure, because I measured 17 1/2 inches of ...Are you sure, because I measured 17 1/2 inches of space? I will check it again and get back to you, lmao. This is classic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171458742742221212007-02-14T08:12:00.000-05:002007-02-14T08:12:00.000-05:00So, you used about 18 inches of blog space to not ...So, you used about 18 inches of blog space to not "contribute to the original post". hahaha.<BR/><BR/>WHO is anal? <BR/><BR/><BR/>hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171433233981776762007-02-14T01:07:00.000-05:002007-02-14T01:07:00.000-05:00sub·stance –noun 1. that of which a thing consis...<B>sub·stance </B> <BR/>–noun 1. that of which a thing consists; physical matter or material: form and substance. <BR/>2. a species of matter of definite chemical composition: a chalky substance. <BR/>3. controlled substance. <BR/>4. the subject matter of thought, discourse, study, etc. <BR/>5. the actual matter of a thing, as opposed to the appearance or shadow; reality. <BR/>6. substantial or solid character or quality: claims lacking in substance. <BR/>7. consistency; body: soup without much substance. <BR/>8. the meaning or gist, as of speech or writing. <BR/>9. something that has separate or independent existence. <BR/>10. Philosophy. a. something that exists by itself and in which accidents or attributes inhere; that which receives modifications and is not itself a mode; something that is causally active; something that is more than an event. <BR/>b. the essential part of a thing; essence. <BR/>c. a thing considered as a continuing whole. <BR/> <BR/>11. possessions, means, or wealth: to squander one's substance. <BR/>12. Linguistics. the articulatory or acoustic reality or the perceptual manifestation of a word or other construction (distinguished from form). <BR/>13. a standard of weights for paper. <BR/>—Idiom14. in substance, a. concerning the essentials; substantially. <BR/>b. actually; really: That is in substance how it appeared to me. <BR/> <BR/><B>conducive </B><BR/><BR/>adjective<BR/> <BR/>tending to bring about; being partly responsible for; "working conditions are not conducive to productivity"; "the seaport was a contributing factor in the growth of the city"; "a contributory factor" <BR/><BR/> <BR/><B>anal </B><BR/><BR/>adjective <BR/>1. of or related to the anus; "anal thermometer" <BR/>2. a stage in psychosexual development when the child's interest is concentrated on the anal region; fixation at this stage is said to result in orderliness, meanness, stubbornness, compulsiveness, etc. [ant: oral] <BR/><BR/><B>Narcissistic</B><BR/>has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements) <BR/>is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love <BR/>believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions) <BR/>requires excessive admiration <BR/>has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations <BR/>is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends <BR/>lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others <BR/>is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her <BR/>shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes <BR/><BR/><B>for·give·ness</B><BR/>–noun 1. act of forgiving; state of being forgiven. <BR/>2. disposition or willingness to forgive. <BR/><BR/><BR/>Oh! Forgive me for I have committed a crime by typing the wrong spelling of a word. Please, I beckon you to forgive this lowly person. If it were not for your kind generosity, I would not be able to function daily. I pledge to you my undying gratitude for eternity. Now....fuck off, oh kind and gracious one!<BR/>P.S. Also, please contribute to the original post, thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171375769877502502007-02-13T09:09:00.000-05:002007-02-13T09:09:00.000-05:00You didnt make a mistake in spelling. The two wor...You didnt make a mistake in spelling. The two words are totally different. You did not use the word properly. <BR/><BR/>Accept and Except. Do you not know the difference? <BR/><BR/>Most people ACCEPT constructive criticism, EXCEPT for those who are defensive about their inadequacies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18027804.post-1171327687016717542007-02-12T19:48:00.000-05:002007-02-12T19:48:00.000-05:00Anonymous said... Anonymous said... Attack a typo ...Anonymous said... <BR/>Anonymous said... Attack a typo and not debate or contribute? <BR/><BR/>When one puts himself up on a pedestal to insult another, he must first be able to accept his own inadequacies. <BR/><BR/>It wasnt a typo. It was your own ignorance. Nice try, though. <BR/><BR/>11:14 PM <BR/><BR/>I might have made a mistake in spelling, but you are still a wee <B>monkey</B> and unable to contribute anything of substance.<BR/><BR/>Btw, you forgot your apostrophes. Aren't they an important part of a sentence structure? Quit being so anal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com