WELCOME BACK TO LAUGHTER

with glee so gluttonous, lips slather
salacious, the prospect of renewal
with the one, oh so valiantly virgin,
veracity vacuous, virginia!
oh how we’ve missed you baby!

Welcome Back!

I don’t mind telling you I was bereft at the prospect Virginia1776’s blog was no more. It was sort of a drug store for poison, and a way-station for ignorance, but going there made us feel so superior, and one simply cannot put a dollar figure on that. As the commercial says, “Priceless”. One wonders why this new blog was created, but perhaps she wished to scale back on some of her contributors who threatened to make some sense, or who otherwise might be perceived to have a better handle on reality than she. I saw no sign of that, but I admit I don’t have the same propensity for paranoia as Virginia. Perhaps someday she’ll honor us with an explanation that will satisfy the curiosity in us.

Because I was pleased so deliciously with her inaugural entry, I feel compelled to insert it in its entirety, although broken into segments for purposes both for my own delight in the response thereof, and to refamiliarize all of us with the way she thinks. It truly is a wonder of the times for those of us who are either amateur or professional students of psychosis, and uncommonly similar to a candy store for those interested in emotional malfunction and reality denial.

First ‘copy and paste’. Virginia’s words. To wit:

Virginia’s text in red, mine in blue.

{As many are already aware, DommieGoddess and I had a falling out. Here is the official story:}

Note that “official story” is defined differently than you and I might perceive as normal. “Official story” in Virginia’s mind manifests itself in whatever gets her from Alpha to Omega in whatever position she wishes the reader to accept. It almost always begins with at least the resemblance of fact but then, almost without pause, moves at light speed to conjecture and spin and outright lies to make its argument. The occasional reader may have difficulty determining where fact begins and fantasy supercedes, but I believe that most true students of Virginia’s particular brand of what passes for thinking might suggest the following. A good rule of thumb on average is that 30% of what she says is true, or at least based on some variety of truth. The other 70% falls into the category of lies, biased opinion, conjecture based on incorrect assumptions, or the nightmares of an unbalanced mind.

The interesting part for me and other fans is trying to decide what is true and what falls into the other catagories, and the fun of assigning value to each of her statements into the category within which they fall. In many ways it is like watching Virginia look at an ink blot, and seeing her brow bubble and simmer until she’s come up with just the right amount of bat wing and wolfbane to identify the pattern as a horizon filled with bombers, missiles, thunderous flashes of explosive lights, and sometimes those flying chimps you saw in “The Wizard of Oz” as a child. Btw, this image never leaves her for those of you not yet initiated into the stunning brain of Virginia.

Second “copy and paste”. To wit:

{LordMercifulVoo made a rather vile statement, "I'm starting to think that Hitler knew something about that murderous group in Israel."}

As you can clearly see, the use of meaningful adjectives designed to persuade and pervade begin immediately. “Vile” is put into place very quickly, and I particularly enjoy the descriptive “rather” preceding for its uniquely “Virginia” tone, sarcasm at its very best stab at assuming elitism. You’ll see examples of this in all her writing. I don’t question the quote she sites usually, mostly because it's usually taken out of context, but that too needs to be substantiated because as most of us know, Virginia employs lies when she doesn’t think we’re watching.

More to wit:

{I challenged him on this statement, questioning his motivation for stating it.}

“I challenged” = as in her courageous duel to the death, indicating a need to demonstrate willingness to pit her own steel balls against those of an opponent whose level of authority and esteem far exceeds her own. Her version of David and Goliath, elevating her own low self-worth while simultaneously attempting to lower her opponent's. She tends to see herself in biblical terms. You might also wish to reference the story of that treacherous little twit who sheared Sampson's magic tresses.

“questioning his motivation” = a need to discover an agenda behind the words, a method always employed by those such as Virginia, who themselves always have an agenda outside of the truth, using an assumption based on her own paranoia, and projecting it onto the object of her envy, in this case Voo.

Again to wit:

{Well, here's my stance on the issue. Paltalk monitors its rooms in social issues regardless if someone called them there or not (espcially as tempers flair with the violence in the middle east). Paltalk made the decision to ban Voo, and he should accept that and move on instead of whining like a 6 year-old with his hand stuck in the cookie jar.}

Keep in mind Virginia has not disconnected her “stance” from the earlier use of “official story”. In her mind, the reader has not been (nor ever will be) afforded permission to question her stance as anything but official. Therefore, her pronouncement about how Paltalk does (and allegedly did in this case) business is “acceptable” as unalterable fact. The final thrust is a typical “Virginiaism” debasing her opponent by creating the image in our minds of an unruly and selfish child. BTW, this is another “projection”. Please note this for use in your future contacts with Virginia as her emotional development was arrested early on in life, and at some level she understands the difference between herself and grownups. Therefore, reinforcement is a constant need.

Another to wit:

{Sorry Voo and Dommie, but you (Voo) don't have special status in paltalk, so get over yourself.}

Well happy readers, this one is just plain fun. Her phrase, “so get over yourself” is one of several similar phrases you will see Virginia deploy both in her writing in blog or text, and often from the microphone of chat rooms. She uses this methodology to dismiss “out of hand” any response or argument that has either been made earlier, or that may be forthcoming. It’s her way of saying, “naa naa naa, I’m right and you’re wrong to infinity, and now I’m gonna hold my hands over my ears and make noise so I can’t hear you.” Some others Virginiaisms are provided below for your enjoyment. Feel free to supplement these with your own favorites. Consider it a game for those of you particularly conversant with Virginia.

* Grow up * Get a life * Get a job * Don’t be such a crybaby * Get some balls * Go home to your mommy

A final to wit:

{This blog will publish conservative perspectives on different topics. I am also considering allowing comments.}

Okay.. here’s my first response to “I am also considering allowing comments.” Are you ready? Okay, I’m working up to it! Here it comes now! I’m almost there! Oh yeah… here it is… This is it… NOWWW!! Watch for it!!!!!

. . . . . . R O F L M A O . . . . . . BA HA HAH . . . . . .

Okay, so that was a letdown, not for me so much as for the reader, but I truly did get a belly laugh from her “consideration” of allowing comments on her blog. Every honest advocate of free expression I know has made fun of Virginia because she will never (By God) allow responses to the fascist waste she passes off as her blog. However, she believes she may accomplish two things with her statement.

First, it’s a way to deflect renewed complaints about this shortcoming from those who have already tweaked her many times before, along with the benefit of misleading new readers into perhaps thinking (erroneously) she has the intent to allow them (at some future point in time) the ability to carry on a real debate of the issues. {Note the blog itself is reserved exclusively for “conservative perspectives”}

Second, it’s a method to attempt to obtain readership. Her other blog was read only by two groups. A. Her own syncophants, a tiny little cult of fascists with lips pressed analwise to Virginia. B. Progressives looking for a laugh as well as the earlier aforementioned aspect of plumbing the depths of Virginia’s uniquely bizarre form of reality. While the latter (B) group is fairly large, the former group (A) is very small. The (B) group does not nourish her need for attention, or at least not the attention she seeks, and the (A) group cannot within the current quantitative constraints even begin to satisfy Virginia's massive appetite.

BTW? If you expect her to truly allow true comments, you’re a newbie to Virginia. She’ll either put it off indefinitely, or allow only identifiable submitters or acceptable responses, or will edit heavily, or will use the “delete” function of her blog. Those negative responses you “may” see will be allowed only if they do not demonstrate the possibility of being interpreted as being better or more right than the entry to which they respond. In short folks, don’t hold your breath for any real free speech being allowed in her blog.

Finally, a couple of speculative conclusions offered for your review here. Virginia’s new blog’s very first entry is an attack on Dommie and Voo. If you’ve read her old blog, or have heard her on mic, or seen her chat room text, you will know this is her almost exclusive contribution to political, social or personal discussion in cyberspace. For instance, the last three entries on her own blog were attacks on me. If you search her blog entries, and those of her Hitler-youth cohorts, you will see this as the trend. You’ll find precious few articles championing a political position or opinion. It is almost always a scathing attack on someone Virginia hates, envies, or is in some way bitter about. Along with this most recent attack on Voo and Dommie, you’ll see articles written about Jesus Claus, me, and others, most of whom are male. Dommie is the exception in this list, but tied together with Voo, can be explained because of her involvement. Her attacks seem always to focus on men. Claus and Voo and I (and the others) could not be any different one from the other in personality and disposition. The common thread is strength of character and convictions, a foundation built on factual evidence, the lack of fear of Virginia, and Virginia’s perception that by taking down strong male figures, she will be able to either bring them down to her level, or elevate herself in the eyes of others. This too is a trait common among not just Virginia, and not just one gender, but among those who believe they are inadequate, and want to hide their inadequacies, or should that fail, distract the observers by manufacturing failings in others. The gender aspect of it is indeed pronounced in Virginia, in the same way inadequate men feel threatened by strong women of honesty, conviction and character. (See S_Link, ArchieBunker, MagnumPotent, BruteLogic, et. al) For future observers, also note her syncophants are almost always men who are easily led by any woman who will pay attention to them. Note too, her sexism goes against strong women as well, but never to the degree of men. You’ll additionally see ageism present with a fair amount of frequency. I won’t provide more, because if I outline all the “isms” Virginia has, the surprise and discovery of seeing new ones will not be as satisfying as it would if you find them on your own.

Have fun with it. Observing Virginia is very similar to watching a Road Runner cartoon, with her as Wile E. Coyote of course, The Three Stooges (she’s Moe, Archie as Larry, and S_Link as Curly), and the super sized version of Ann Coulter after a genital swap with Bill O’Reilly, or in Virginia’s case, S_Link), but that’s redundant in all cases. You’ll discover thrills and chills, excitement, anticipation, and just plain good clean enjoyment as you watch the traveling foibles of one of the all time greats of disingenuous prattle. With a lift and tilt of the glass, here’s to a long new and predictably hilarious future. Cheers!

V's new blog http://conservthink.blogspot.com/