Pages

Search Ratttler

Friday, August 17, 2007

FAUX NOISE AT IT AGAIN

Thursday during Special Report, FOX reporter David Lee Miller admitted that FOX News actually did alter Wikipedia entries. Will wonders never cease?! Watch the video.



Hey I didn't say it, Faux Noise did. Fair and balanced my ass.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, well, well. Once again, Muse doesn't understand what she hears and reads. The piece said that a computer USED at Fox News edited an article on Wikipedia. It never said it changed a news article, or even what kind of article it was used to change at all. But, in all of Muse's misguided glory, she will sensationalize something to make you think one thing when the truth is another.

Muse, the article that was edited on a Fox News computer could have been about the person's own family for pete's sake!

You're still a dumbass!

WFG said...

While I don't think Muse is a dumbass, I do have to say that this post probably lacks for fairness, given that other news media were cited in the story.

Obviously, Muse, your intent is to add onto the evidence and criticism of FoxNews, and this does add to it, but I think the anonymous above has made a reasonable criticism himself.

Then again, I admit to not hating FN, and rather enjoy the show Red Eye.

MysticSeaMaiden said...

eff is red eye the show getting canceled on fox? I heard that some show they have is being canceled and i know it to be a comedy like one. and gtsu :)

MysticSeaMaiden said...

anonymouse Sorry to infor you but this is a story that was covered by the mass media, granted after I posted it but still. So it seems this is not just my opinion. Would you like to talk about how Faux Noise couldnt show the right picture for a senator, or perhaps how they call Bush as winner in 2000 election in fla while the votes were still being counted?

WFG said...

I believe 1/2 Hour News Hour is the one that's in trouble.

MysticSeaMaiden said...

Thank you Eff, now you said half hour I do remember they said an half hr program. SO good to see you are still here :)

Anonymous said...

Muse, I know your world is shattered to find that Wikipedia is not factual information. Dont worry, Voo still believes too.

Go back and listen to the article with an open ear. It doesnt matter who covered it, mass media or local news... the point of the story is that Wikipedia can be manipulated and therefor isnt factual. Your hatred of Fox News is very apparent though. Good job on getting that passion across, although I dont exactly know what you think you have accomplished.

Anonymous said...

She's accomplished being an idiot much like Dan Rather (liberal)

WFG said...

Pink Champagne and a Slinky

Q Jordon said...

Speaking of Dan Rather, I wonder how many people realize that typeset that was used in the memo that got Mr. Rather and his producer in trouble, was the same typeset that was found on the National Guard pay receipt that the Bush Administration gave to the newspapers to show he served.

That is a fact. It was investigated by the same people that claimed the memo was a fake.
And yet, I heard not a peep out of them on the receipt. A liberal media bias my ass.

Q

Anonymous said...

You gotta be a total retarded to watch foxnews,like those millions of american zombies who allow for loud mouthed ,flag waving wankers to do their thinking for them.
Murdoch is laughing all the way to the bank thanks to them!

WFG said...

Guess I'm retarded.

Anonymous said...

Eff...dont take it too personal,i just use strong language to drive my points.
As for foxnews though here's a link to a couple of documentaries which spill the beans on the inner working of the network.the irony here is that foxnews advertise itself as fair and balanced. Well is it?
here's another perspective (scroll down the bottom of the list...."outfoxed" and "foxnews its ok to lie")

http://question911.com/linksall.htm

As a bonus the videos are free to download and no registration is required!

WFG said...

I've seen some clips from documentaries against FN before, such as Outfoxed; not sure if there methods are too good either. I have some criticism of FN myself, but I just don't consider it the devil some do.

WFG said...

*their

MysticSeaMaiden said...

I'm so amazed that some anonymouse think I believe wiki is a factual trust worthy place to get info. wiki site is only as good as refences if they have links you can follow that take you out of wiki
Would ya'll like to try another tactic?

LMAO

WFG said...

Slate article on Wikiscanner

Pageviews