Pages

Search Ratttler

Friday, November 18, 2005

THE "WE WON" ARGUMENT

I just got finished spanking MrArchieBunker like a disobedient gimp, and something occurred to me as I spoke. Most people who frequent Mainstream know that conservatives are often obsessed with who wins and who loses in politics. Take note of this tired statement from Arch:

MrArchieBunker: POOR CLAUS, HE HATES THE FACT THAT THERE HAS BEEN 4 2 TERM GOP PRESIDENTS SINCE 1950

Now, even taking into acc- wait. Hold on. I just noticed something. He said four 2-term presidents. Since 1950. So, Eisenhower was the first, and Dubya is the latest. Going back, we have Reagan...and then...

Oh. Holy shit. He's counting Nixon. Nixon, the president whose name is synonymous with corruption. The man who was forced to resign, in disgrace, because of his involvement in sleaze. That is the best argument Archie has? Counting up terms and years, and having so little substance to your argument that you resort to using a scumbag like Nixon to shore yourself up? That's like using a jackhammer to bail out a leaky boat. It's like wearing a lead-lined bathing suit. What kind of idiot makes arguments like this?

Hello? Can we get a ruling over here? We deserve a better caliber of conservatice on PT. Is there someone we can talk to about this? Is there a temp agency we can get a few substitutes from until someone can look into the critical shortage of intelligent conservatives on PT? You know, this would never happen while a Democrat was president.

JC

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Gentlemen of doubtful heritage,

In this post you say, "Most people who frequent Mainstream know that conservatives are often obsessed with who wins and who loses in politics."

So, tell me who is obsessed with who wins and who loses in politics when in your blog titled "See how you like it." "posted by Jesus Claus @ 2:34 AM", you said, "Casey sees him as in some ways a necessary evil. I think his constant undermining of the Democratic Party, and his crossing over party lines to lend legitimacy to the opposition is unforgivable." Oh, how I love pointing out your inadequacies. You really should have that mouth fixed; youre speaking from both sides of it.

Insincerely,
Convinced

zombiemaster said...

Dear Convinced:

Below please find your Iq test scores from your local school. I think it must be a painful memory for you.

Intellagance: 53
Reasoning: 42
Logic: 17

Explantion:
The subjecy shows selective reasoning of a 3 year old. He not capable of any intellgance. Please keep him off any polictial chat programs and he should be allowed only to watch the cartoon network 24 hours a day.

Anonymous said...

LMAO you DUMBASS!

It's spelled intelligence!!!! LMAO

NOW.. WHO doesn't have any?

Pageviews