Pages

Search Ratttler

Friday, September 22, 2006

A SIGN OF THINGS TO COME

Ok, just a little post to let everyone know that I have not forgotten about this news site. The makeover fits me nicely with the black trim and wider screen for people to read. Nice Jesus, Real Nice.

Hugo Chavez called Bush the devil and got a standing ovation for it in the UN, then spoke at a college and called him a drunk. I think there is a precedent here being set and it shows that REAL men still speak the truth after all. Our leader is not above criticism and I think it shows. I say the more other world leaders preach the truth, the more Americans will see what Bush is really about. To those Democratics who stuck up for Bush: SHAME ON YOU! As the midterm elections are coming up, the races get more interesting and I am ready for the shift in power that's coming, is Mr. Soon To Be Lame Duck? Makes you wonder.

I see the tattler and conservastink have done nothing with their respective (and I use the term loosely) blogs. I wonder if they came back to reality after fainting at the latest truth to come out of the UN. We will see about that.

More to come later...Im tired and wanted to get this off my chest.
ZM

2 comments:

WFG said...

From what I've heard, some Democrats' defense of Bush has partially consisted of telling Mr. Chavez that he has no right, I assume in principle and not legally, to criticise Bush in the manner he did and here in the US.

To be honest, I don't agree with using such labels as "Devil" in a forum like the UN, as I believe that in order for closed-minds to be open to the UN, the UN has to try to be restrained and mature, not supportive of insults as Chavez gave, which hurts the UN more than it helps the world body. But I don't agree with the Democrats who have told Chavez he can't at all say what he did anywhere in the US. Of course he can. I don't agree with his labels and the venue he chose, though I can't deny its effectiveness for getting out his message, but I wouldn't tell him "only Americans can comment on their President," as some Democrats have. There's a difference between being critical of speech and trying to suppress it, and those Democrats are trying to suppress it. They're wrong. That's where their shame lies.

zombiemaster said...

Jay- your a half wit who jacks off to animal porn.

Pageviews