Pages

Search Ratttler

Saturday, June 28, 2008

MOTHERS IS OFF THE MARKET!!!



I know we still remember with sadness how Mothers and Dan parted ways, we all had heavy hearts to know that Mothers was on the prowl again. I woefully have to inform all you guys that it seems that Mothers is off the market. Mothers has found yet another true low; hmm I mean love, I wonder if her husband is going to care?

It just goes to show you love exist for everyone, even ex-nuns, strippers with Wal-marts brought false teeth.

Read on to warm your heart, if you have a strong stomach


MothersNaTiVE: LOC>> lets build ..GITMO 2.. for traitors

tommyjohnson44: yes mothers

tommyjohnson44: we can send the most radical liberals there

tommyjohnson44: i think radical liberals are a danger to the US

LocMuir_8: Mothers, no we'll feed them to the Polar bears, we're saving

MothersNaTiVE: LOC>> polar bears,,, will starve.. LOL

MothersNaTiVE: sonya.. i dance on poles

sonya_b_2003: mothers u suck them too

MothersNaTiVE: sonya.. not a bad idea

Mystic Sea Maiden: Mothers know who said this? The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.

tommyjohnson44: mystic ronald reagan?

MothersNaTiVE: no comment

LocMuir_8: <<<<<
MothersNaTiVE: LOC>> yesssssssss

Mystic Sea Maiden: Mothers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Would you say someone that criticizes the president is a traitor???????????

sonya_b_2003: mothers answer mystic

sonya_b_2003: MOTHERS ANSWER MYSTIC U HYPOCRITE

sonya_b_2003: see mystic mothers cant answer you

sonya_b_2003: mothers is a lying tramp

sonya_b_2003: MYSTIC SEE SHE PRETENDS LIKE SHE DIDNT SEE IT LOL

Mystic Sea Maiden: MOTHER WOULD YOU SAY SOMEONE THAT CRITICIZES THE PRESIDENT IS A TRAITOR????????

sonya_b_2003: MOTHERS IS A FAKE

Mystic Sea Maiden: lol sonya, Mothers is scared of me

sonya_b_2003: lol mystic she should be

sonya_b_2003: because u are smart and hot and u have teeth

Mystic Sea Maiden: Loc I ask you the same question WOULD YOU SAY SOMEONE THAT CRITICIZES THE PRESIDENT IS A TRAITOR?

Mystic Sea Maiden: Mothers do you fear me?

*** LocMuir_8 has left the room ***

Mystic Sea Maiden: then answer the question Mother, for if you refuse to answer the question your actions prove you to be a liar and fearful and the question is WOULD YOU SAY SOMEONE THAT CRITICIZES THE PRESIDENT IS A TRAITOR?

Mystic Sea Maiden: aww Loc ran

*** MothersNaTiVE has left the room ***



Oh did I forget to tell you that Mothers' newest love is even more insane than Dan? (oh wait Loc is Dan)

They don't call me Facetious Muse for nothing

8 comments:

tommyjohnson44 said...

Facetissuemouse I have a few things I think might destroy America before the items Mystic mentioned. Let me list them for the simple to understand
1) Liberals only supporting the USA when they are the majority in power.
2) Liberals who care more about the enemy than US troops
3) Liberal politicians sayings things like "the war is lost" "torture chambers in Iraq open under new management, US managment", "US troops are terrorizing Iraqi women and children", saying US Marines are guilty of murder before 7 or 8 are acquitted. Harry Reid,Ted Kennedy,John Kerry,Jack Murtha
4) Obama being elected in November 2008. Obama being elected in 2012 or 2016 doesn't concern me as much because he will have experience by then
5)The liberal mainstream media being able to fool enough sheep to put liberals in power
6)The left trying to take a country started using christian principals and capitalism and changing it to a secular socialist country
7) Liberals expecting their goverment to do everything for them from cradle to grave.
8) Thinking wind solar and cow shit can take the place of crude oil within the next 25 years.

Hey Muse trying getting a life that doesn't suck so bad you have to spend time attacking people personally instead of dealing with the real issues

Anonymous said...

Looks more to me like Sonya and Mystic are demanding answers and crying like school girls because they aren't getting any. I say Mothers won that round. The whole point of the exchange was to see who could piss off who the best.

Mothers won

Why didn't you print that conclusion Muse? She won hands down.

Here's something else to think of ...
Not only did Mothers win that battle of the pissing contest, but she managed to fool you into displaying her victory on this blog. Damn she's so much more intelligent than you are.

Anonymous said...

Lol Jesus how did mothers win anything? Mystic had asked mothers a question and she conveniently avoided it. But that is typical of the spinning from the republicans. I always wait for the head to spin off and pea soup to start spewing. Yes Im crying because Im laughing so hard at the conversation and my stupid petty snide remarks at mothers. But that is the joy of pal talk drama so think what you want my dear.

Anonymous said...

i couldnt figure out how to post something so i put it here.Capricorn22
A Child’s Guide To United States Foreign Policy
July 19th, 2003 • Related • Filed Under
Related Post

* Bush Announces Withdrawal Of 20,000 Troops From Iraq; No Timeline For Remainder
* Democrats Say Bush Failed To Provide Plans For Future Of Iraq
* APEC: John Howard and George Bush Joint Press Conference
* Bush Delivers State Of The Union Address
* Blair Announces Resignation After Ten Years As British Prime Minister
* Bush Announces Extra 20,000 Troops To Iraq

Filed Under: Bush • Foreign Policy • Iraq
Tags: George W Bush • Iraq • Saddam Hussein • satire • WMD

Satire

This piece is currently floating around cyberspace.

Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?

A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey.

Q: But the inspectors didn’t find any weapons of mass destruction.

A: That’s because the Iraqis were hiding them.

Q: And that’s why we invaded Iraq?

A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.

Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn’t find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?

A: That’s because the weapons are so well hidden. Don’t worry, we’ll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.

Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?

A: To use them in a war, silly.

Q: I’m confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn’t they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?

A: Well, obviously they didn’t want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.

Q: That doesn’t make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons to fight us back with?

A: It’s a different culture. It’s not supposed to make sense.

Q: I don’t know about you, but I don’t think they had any of thoseweapons our government said they did.

A: Well, you know, it doesn’t matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.

Q: And what was that?

A: Even if Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.

Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?

A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.

Q: Kind of like what they do in China?

A: Don’t go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.

Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it’s a good country, even if that country tortures people?

A: Right.

Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?

A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.

Q: Isn’t that exactly what happens in China?

A: I told you, China is different.

Q: What’s the difference between China and Iraq?

A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba’ath party, while China is Communist.

Q: Didn’t you once tell me Communists were bad?

A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.

Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?

A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.

Q: Like in Iraq?

A: Exactly.

Q: And like in China, too?

A: I told you, China’s a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.

Q: How come Cuba isn’t a good economic competitor?

A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being communists and started being capitalists like us.

Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn’t that help the Cubans become capitalists?

A: Don’t be a smart-ass.

Q: I didn’t think I was being one.

A: Well, anyway, they also don’t have freedom of religion in Cuba.

Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?

A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he’s not really a legitimate leader anyway.

Q: What’s a military coup?

A: That’s when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.

Q: Didn’t the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?

A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.

Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?

A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.

Q: Didn’t you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?

A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.

Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?

A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.

Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?

A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men, fifteen of them Saudi Arabians, hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.

Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?

A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.

Q: Aren’t the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people’s heads and hands?

A: Yes, that’s exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people’s heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.

Q: Didn’t the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?

A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.

Q: Fighting drugs?

A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.

Q: How did they do such a good job?

A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.

Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people’s heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people’s heads and hands off for other reasons?

A: Yes. It’s OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people’s hands for growing flowers, but it’s cruel if they cut off people’s hands for stealing bread.

Q: Don’t they also cut off people’s hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?

A: That’s different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.

Q: Don’t Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?

A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.

Q: What’s the difference?

A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers.

Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.

A: Now, don’t go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.

Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.

A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.

Q: Who trained them?

A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.

Q: Was he from Afghanistan?

A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.

Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.

A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.

Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?

A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.

Q: So the Soviets, I mean, the Russians, are now our friends?

A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we’re mad at them now. We’re also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn’t help us invade Iraq either.

Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?

A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.

Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn’t do what we want them to do?

A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.

Q: But wasn’t Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?

A: Well, yeah. For a while.

Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?

A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.

Q: Why did that make him our friend?

A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.

Q: Isn’t that when he gassed the Kurds?

A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.

Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?

A: Most of the time, yes.

Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?

A: Sometimes that’s true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.

Q: Why?

A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America’s side, anyone who opposes war is a godless un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?

Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?

A: Yes.

Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?

A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.

Q: So basically, what you’re saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?

A: Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.

IsabellaSays said...

ummmm... mystic?.. uh.. Loc IS DAN LOL
I thought you knew that
lol

MysticSeaMaiden said...

I did know Isa, the funny thing is only you knew that besides me.

LOL

Anonymous said...

I knew it too unless she got loc aka dan confused with the englishman named daniel! (ducks) Sorry hubby just joking!!

MysticSeaMaiden said...

BTW guys if you hi-lite after "Oh did I forget to tell you that Mothers' newest love is even more insane than Dan?" in the post you will have a surprise :)

Pageviews